更正: 作者紮了這些稻草人，然後用 Reality 來打擊他所謂的 Myths，我認為是不對的。因為部分他提到的 Myths 其實根本不是 Myths。

我看法倒是不同，把 myth 拿來宣傳等於是把人家騙來用 Fx，等人家實際使用發現 Fx 不是那麼完美時，會對 Fx 的宣傳策略產生反感。

依據事實來宣傳，就是最好的策略。(我是念科學的，所以「真理」是我的最高指導原則，也許讀文法商的會有不同的看法吧？)

釐清不是不好，只是我覺得這篇文章內容有些地方有問題。

Sorry for my typo. Meant to type Not his “myths”...

Okay.

Except I agree with the "myths" he mentioned, simply I've read/heard Firefox extremists and blind followers saying things very close to "myths" he mentioned.

Andrew K.’s motives for his Firefox Myths article are simple:

Firstly and mostly, he wants to create as much controversy as he can to draw maximum attention to his page with the maximum amount of ads the AdSense program allows. He does everything from spamming around a hundred different sites under about a dozen different identities, all claiming to be unaffiliated with the article, to libel, deliberately misquoting people, and threatening to sue owners of sites that talk negatively about his article.

Overall it was an entertaining read, though I’d question how many really are “myths” and how many are made up “myths” so the author had content to write about.