MozTW 討論區 :: 檢視主題 - [Fx]Firefox CE musume (4.0b/3.6.12/3.0.x/2.0.0.22)

ztycx 寫:

i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen?

That's fine. It's normal.

roytam1 寫:

ztycx 寫:

i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen?

That's fine. It's normal.

so are these two "gdiplus.dll" identical in term of performance on your build? how can i activate the gdiplus.dll from your dlls instead of system version?

ztycx 寫:

roytam1 寫:

ztycx 寫:

i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen?

That's fine. It's normal.

so are these two "gdiplus.dll" identical in term of performance on your build? how can i activate the gdiplus.dll from your dlls instead of system version?

My version should be newer than system's one. You can simply replace it with my gdiplus.dll

roytam1 寫:

ztycx 寫:

roytam1 寫:

ztycx 寫:

i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen?

That's fine. It's normal.

so are these two "gdiplus.dll" identical in term of performance on your build? how can i activate the gdiplus.dll from your dlls instead of system version?

My version should be newer than system's one. You can simply replace it with my gdiplus.dll

is that possible that you could program your build to make use of the gdiplus.dll in the local directory in the top priority, like the cases of msvcp.dll and msvcr.dll. then it can save the risk of changing files in system folder. thanks.

ztycx 寫:

roytam1 寫:

ztycx 寫:

roytam1 寫:

ztycx 寫:

i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen?

That's fine. It's normal.

so are these two "gdiplus.dll" identical in term of performance on your build? how can i activate the gdiplus.dll from your dlls instead of system version?

My version should be newer than system's one. You can simply replace it with my gdiplus.dll

You can create a file named "firefox.exe.local" in the same directory(folder) as firefox.exe lies. That file forcing firefox.exe load its own directory's dll first.

發現一個不知道算不算問題的問題

只要nProtect的GameGuard常駐中Fx就無法啟動
如果是事先開啟Fx就沒問題

UPX壓縮後造成的?

而我比較懷疑是GameGuard禁止了UPX的in-place decompression，可以用ASPack/PECompat等同類程式測試

roytam1 寫:

而我比較懷疑是GameGuard禁止了UPX的in-place decompression，可以用ASPack/PECompat等同類程式測試

報告一下剛剛的測試

decompress之後就可以在GameGuard常駐下開啟
不過再次compress後便又無法在GameGuard常駐下開啟
1.5.0.8(2006102211)(2006102009)皆是如此
再往前的版本我就沒有試了

奇怪的是另外找來pigfoot大的1.5.0.7 P0 build
經過compress卻依然可以在GameGuard常駐下開啟

GameMon是掛在PSU上的Rev 860

Updated:
Firefox 2.0 Release Builds / NoSSE Release Builds
http://two.fsphost.com/roytam1/

roytam1 寫:

Updated:
Firefox 2.0 Release Builds / NoSSE Release Builds
http://two.fsphost.com/roytam1/

x_x為甚麼我會轉到fsphost的主頁...

發表人:	ztycx [ 2006-09-25, 13:29 ]
文章主題 :
roytam1 寫: ztycx 寫: i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen? That's fine. It's normal. so are these two "gdiplus.dll" identical in term of performance on your build? how can i activate the gdiplus.dll from your dlls instead of system version?

發表人:	roytam1 [ 2006-09-25, 19:01 ]
文章主題 :
ztycx 寫: roytam1 寫: ztycx 寫: i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen? That's fine. It's normal. so are these two "gdiplus.dll" identical in term of performance on your build? how can i activate the gdiplus.dll from your dlls instead of system version? My version should be newer than system's one. You can simply replace it with my gdiplus.dll

發表人:	ztycx [ 2006-09-25, 20:40 ]
文章主題 :
roytam1 寫: ztycx 寫: roytam1 寫: ztycx 寫: i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen? That's fine. It's normal. so are these two "gdiplus.dll" identical in term of performance on your build? how can i activate the gdiplus.dll from your dlls instead of system version? My version should be newer than system's one. You can simply replace it with my gdiplus.dll is that possible that you could program your build to make use of the gdiplus.dll in the local directory in the top priority, like the cases of msvcp.dll and msvcr.dll. then it can save the risk of changing files in system folder. thanks.

發表人:	roytam1 [ 2006-09-26, 01:53 ]
文章主題 :
ztycx 寫: roytam1 寫: ztycx 寫: roytam1 寫: ztycx 寫: i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen? That's fine. It's normal. so are these two "gdiplus.dll" identical in term of performance on your build? how can i activate the gdiplus.dll from your dlls instead of system version? My version should be newer than system's one. You can simply replace it with my gdiplus.dll is that possible that you could program your build to make use of the gdiplus.dll in the local directory in the top priority, like the cases of msvcp.dll and msvcr.dll. then it can save the risk of changing files in system folder. thanks. You can create a file named "firefox.exe.local" in the same directory(folder) as firefox.exe lies. That file forcing firefox.exe load its own directory's dll first.

發表人:	ztycx [ 2006-09-26, 23:59 ]
文章主題 :
roytam1 寫: ztycx 寫: roytam1 寫: ztycx 寫: roytam1 寫: ztycx 寫: i'm using fx-1.5.0-bin-2006092118 build. by process explorer, i noticed, instead of musume-built "gdiplus.dll","gdiplus.dll' from "C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS" was called by firefox.exe. should it happen? That's fine. It's normal. so are these two "gdiplus.dll" identical in term of performance on your build? how can i activate the gdiplus.dll from your dlls instead of system version? My version should be newer than system's one. You can simply replace it with my gdiplus.dll is that possible that you could program your build to make use of the gdiplus.dll in the local directory in the top priority, like the cases of msvcp.dll and msvcr.dll. then it can save the risk of changing files in system folder. thanks. You can create a file named "firefox.exe.local" in the same directory(folder) as firefox.exe lies. That file forcing firefox.exe load its own directory's dll first. thx! i tried your method, however, not work. still call gdiplus.dll from system folder

MozTW 討論區 https://forum.moztw.org/

[Fx]Firefox CE musume (4.0b/3.6.12/3.0.x/2.0.0.22) - 壓縮檔 https://forum.moztw.org/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=13234	第 18 頁 (共 21 頁)

發表人:	roytam1 [ 2006-10-11, 18:05 ]
文章主題 :
Updated: Firefox 1.5.0.8pre(2006101102) Firefox 2.0(2006101102) Firefox 1.5.0.8pre NoSSE(2006101102) Now using UPX 2.90w LZMA/10 to compress exe files and dll files, please test if this change breaks Firefox musume. Thanks. 現在改用UPX 2.90w LZMA/10去壓縮EXE和DLL檔，如果這項更變導致問題，請回報。

發表人:	kingme [ 2006-10-14, 06:34 ]
文章主題 :
有 2.0rc2 未?

發表人:	roytam1 [ 2006-10-14, 12:10 ]
文章主題 :
kingme 寫: 有 2.0rc2 未? 已經是了。

發表人:	痕 [ 2006-10-23, 22:35 ]
文章主題 :
發現一個不知道算不算問題的問題只要nProtect的GameGuard常駐中Fx就無法啟動如果是事先開啟Fx就沒問題 UPX壓縮後造成的?

發表人:	roytam1 [ 2006-10-24, 00:52 ]
文章主題 :
痕寫: 發現一個不知道算不算問題的問題只要nProtect的GameGuard常駐中Fx就無法啟動如果是事先開啟Fx就沒問題 UPX壓縮後造成的? 應該無關... 倒是GameGuard自身與其他程式的兼容性不太好有關。當然要是懷疑UPX 2.90w的兼容性的話，可以照以下方法測試：下載 http://upx.sourceforge.net/download/uns ... px290w.zip 並解壓upx.exe至Firefox的目錄中建立UnpackAll.bat，內容如下：代碼: @for /R %%x in (.exe;.dll) do upx -d "%%~x" 執行UnpackAll.bat，就會自動把Firefox目錄中的所有exe/dll檔給解壓了執行Firefox.exe 而我比較懷疑是GameGuard禁止了UPX的in-place decompression，可以用ASPack/PECompat等同類程式測試

發表人:	痕 [ 2006-10-24, 04:32 ]
文章主題 :
roytam1 寫: 而我比較懷疑是GameGuard禁止了UPX的in-place decompression，可以用ASPack/PECompat等同類程式測試報告一下剛剛的測試 decompress之後就可以在GameGuard常駐下開啟不過再次compress後便又無法在GameGuard常駐下開啟 1.5.0.8(2006102211)(2006102009)皆是如此再往前的版本我就沒有試了奇怪的是另外找來pigfoot大的1.5.0.7 P0 build 經過compress卻依然可以在GameGuard常駐下開啟 GameMon是掛在PSU上的Rev 860

發表人:	roytam1 [ 2006-10-24, 07:17 ]
文章主題 :
痕寫: roytam1 寫: 而我比較懷疑是GameGuard禁止了UPX的in-place decompression，可以用ASPack/PECompat等同類程式測試報告一下剛剛的測試 decompress之後就可以在GameGuard常駐下開啟不過再次compress後便又無法在GameGuard常駐下開啟 1.5.0.8(2006102211)(2006102009)皆是如此再往前的版本我就沒有試了奇怪的是另外找來pigfoot大的1.5.0.7 P0 build 經過compress卻依然可以在GameGuard常駐下開啟 GameMon是掛在PSU上的Rev 860 這樣啊... 有可能是某個patch壓縮後跟GameGuard衝突了可是不知道是哪個patch出問題我沒辦法修了... orz 現在就先解壓湊合用吧

發表人:	roytam1 [ 2006-10-25, 19:13 ]
文章主題 :
Updated: Firefox 2.0 Release Builds / NoSSE Release Builds http://two.fsphost.com/roytam1/

發表人:	幻月 [ 2006-10-26, 20:02 ]
文章主題 :
roytam1 寫: Updated: Firefox 2.0 Release Builds / NoSSE Release Builds http://two.fsphost.com/roytam1/ x_x為甚麼我會轉到fsphost的主頁...

第 18 頁 (共 21 頁)	所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

發表人:	roytam1 [ 2006-10-26, 21:20 ]
文章主題 :
幻月寫: roytam1 寫: Updated: Firefox 2.0 Release Builds / NoSSE Release Builds http://two.fsphost.com/roytam1/ x_x為甚麼我會轉到fsphost的主頁... 可能是FSPHost方面的問題...莔rz