可能我的理解不同。還請指點。

OO.o 有一堆 fork 也不打緊，只要大家都有共通的格式可以交換就不成問題。我同意 OO.o 的核心價值不應在支援 MS 格式，但有沒有殺手級的功能也不太像是重點。重點是大家都支援相同而公開的共通格式。

"For some, there is definitely less incentive to switch to free platforms, which is a pity," he said. "On the other hand, we see users that simply cannot switch that easily, and we're able to open up the world of KDE for them as well. Having KDE applications run on Windows of course also makes a lot of sense for enterprise users [as] they don't have to support one client per operating system that might be used in the company, but they can standardize on, for example, KMail as a PIM solution."

Kugler said another benefit will be attracting new developers to work on those platforms which will help make KDE better.

"The focus for KDE, however, will always remain on free software and free platforms, including the operating system," he said.

我頗看好KOffice 2.0，在桌面排版上下了相當多的功夫，沒有像OOo一樣「複製」M$ Office

據我的粗淺瞭解，OO.o 學 MS Office，是為了讓轉換更容易。

FC4 測試 OOoP 2.3.0 失敗，安裝是成功，可是執行時才說要 GLIBC 2.4 以上！唉……現在只好重灌 OOo，還得花時間重新優化～～